Saturday, March 12, 2016
PREPARING FOR HEAVEN - Part 03
PREPARING FOR HEAVEN - Part 02
“And in the second year of the reign of Nebuchadnezzar Nebuchadnezzar dreamed dreams, wherewith his spirit was troubled, and his sleep brake from him.” Daniel 2:1 Daniel was carried into captivity in the first year of Nebuchadnezzar. For three years he was placed under instructors, during which time he would not, of course, be reckoned among the wise men of the kingdom, nor take part in public affairs. Yet in the second year of Nebu chadnezzar, the transactions recorded in this chapter took place. How, then, could Daniel be brought in to interpret the king’s dream in his second year? The explanation lies in the fact that Nebuchadnezzar reigned for two years conjointly with his father, Nabopolassar. From this point the Jews reck oned, while the Chaldeans reckoned from the time he began to reign alone on the death of his father. It appears that the next year after Daniel had completed his preparation to participate in the affairs of the Chaldean empire, the providence of God brought him into sudden and remarkable prominence throughout the kingdom. Babylon, the first world empire, was the greatest, richest, and most influential of all the empires in the then known civilized world. It also had the most powerful king. This leader of men had managed by sheer force to put down his enemies one by one, until his kingdom stood as the Queen of nations. In the second year of his reign, King Nebuchadnezzar went to bed wondering just how long his kingdom would endure. He wanted to know about the future. That night, God looked down from heaven and chose to entrust this benevolent dictator with a look into the future. The King had a strange dream and when he awoke he was really upset. He couldn’t remember the dream. But he knew it was important.
(18) [Daniel and the Revelation] -- "graphics"
(19A) Mysterious Dream “Then the king commanded to call the magicians, and the astrologers, and the sorcerers, and the Chaldeans, for to shew the king his dreams. So they came and stood before the king. And the king said unto them, I have dreamed a dream, and my spirit was troubled to know the dream.” Daniel 2:2, 3 He sent for his wise men and magicians and told them he had dreamed a dream and was anxious to know the meaning of it.
Wise men = psychics. Magicians = casters of spells, witches. Astrologers = Foretelling future by star charts, fortune tellers. Sorcerers = Claim to communicate with the dead, Spiritualists. Chaldeans = Philosophers of psychic divination, numerology etc.
“Then spake the Chaldeans to the king in Syriack, O king, live for ever: tell thy servants the dream, and we will shew the interpretation.” Daniel 2:4 It is clear that these ancient magicians and astrologers seem to have been clever in getting enough information to be able to give answers in such a vague manner that they would seem right whichever way the events turned out. Now, true to their cunning instincts, they called upon the king to make known to them his dream. If they could get full infor mation respecting this, they could easily agree on some inter pretation which would not endanger their reputation. They spoke to the king in Syriac, a dialect of the Chaldean language which was used by the educated and cul tured classes. From this point to the end of Daniel 7, the record continues in Chaldaic, the language spoken by the king. “The king answered and said to the Chaldeans, The thing is gone from me: if ye will not make known unto me the dream, with the interpretation thereof, ye shall be cut in pieces, and your houses shall be made a dunghill. But if ye shew the dream, and the interpretation thereof, ye shall receive of me
20 Daniel and the Revelation gifts and rewards and great honour: therefore shew me the dream, and the interpretation thereof. They answered again and said, Let the king tell his servants the dream, and we will shew the interpretation of it.” Daniel 2:5-7 These men claimed to have access to all the secrets of the living and the dead, past and future, including the knowledge of the gods. This was not an unreasonable request the king was asking of them, if all their boastful claims were true. It is important to realize that in all the ages of earth’s history Satan has tried to duplicate the powers of God but his counterfeits do not come close to the 100% accuracy of God’s prophetic Word. “The king answered and said, I know of certainty that ye would gain the time, because ye see the thing is gone from me. But if ye will not make known unto me the dream, there is but one decree for you: for ye have prepared lying and corrupt words to speak before me, till the time be changed: therefore tell me the dream, and I shall know that ye can shew me the interpretation thereof.” Daniel 2:8, 9 The wise men and magicians were confident that they could easily make up an interpretation to please the king if they knew the dream, but no-one could dare to make up the dream as well! “The Chaldeans answered before the king, and said, There is not a man upon the earth that can shew the king’s matter: therefore there is no king, lord, nor ruler, that asked such things at any magician, or astrologer, or Chaldean. And it is a rare thing that the king requireth, and there is none other that can shew it before the king, except the gods, whose dwelling is not with flesh.” Daniel 2:10-11 “Tell us the dream, and we’ll tell you what it means,” pleaded the magicians. “Nobody can tell you what your dream was. No king ever asked such an unreasonable thing!” “For this cause the king was angry and very furious, and commanded to destroy all the wise men of Babylon.” Daniel 2:12. It was obvious to the king their claims were only idle
(21A) Mysterious Dream tales; they couldn’t do it. They even complained that the King was being unreasonable and this threw Nebuchadnezzar into a fury. He was so angry, he shouted: “Kill all these wise men and magicians!” Some have denounced Nebuchadnezzar in this matter, as a heartless, unreasonable tyrant. But what did these magicians profess to be able to do? Reveal hidden things; foretell events; make known mys teries entirely beyond human understanding, by supernatural means. There was therefore nothing unjust in Nebuchadnezzar’s demand that they should make known his dream. When they declared that none but the gods, whose dwelling was not with flesh, could make known the king’s matter, they admitted they had no communication with these gods, and knew nothing beyond what human wisdom could reveal. “And the decree went forth that the wise men should be slain; and they sought Daniel and his fellows to be slain.” Daniel 2:13 The soldiers started collecting all the magicians to execute them. “Then Daniel answered with counsel and wisdom to Arioch the captain of the king’s guard, which was gone forth to slay the wise men of Babylon: He answered and said to Arioch the king’s captain, Why is the decree so hasty from the king? Then Arioch made the thing known to Daniel.” Daniel 2:14, 15 Daniel and his friends were to die too because they were among the wise men and magicians. “Why does the King want to kill all his wise men,” he asked. It was strange that Daniel and his companions, declared by the king ten times better than all his magicians and astrologers, were not called first in this matter. But God had a reason for this. Had the king called on Daniel at the first to make known the matter, the magicians would not have been brought to the test. But God would give the heathen systems of the Chaldeans the first chance. He would let them try and fail, that they might be the better prepared
(22)[Daniel and the Revelation] to acknowledge His intervention when He should finally manifest His power in behalf of His captive servants, and for the honor of His name. Daniel, first learning of the situation when the executioners come for his arrest, asked for time that he might consult the God whose dwelling was not with men, and pray for wisdom to make the dream known to the king. “Then Daniel went in, and desired of the king that he would give him time, and that he would shew the king the interpretation.” Daniel 2:16 The king agreed to give Daniel time to consider the matter; a privilege which probably none of the magicians could have obtained, as the king had already ac cused them of preparing false words, and seek ing to gain time for this very purpose. “Then Daniel went to his house, and made the thing known to Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah, his companions: That they would desire mercies of the God of heaven concerning this secret; that Daniel and his fellows should not perish with the rest of the wise men of Babylon. Then was the secret revealed unto Daniel in a night vision. Then Daniel blessed the God of heaven.” Daniel 2:17-19 Daniel at once went to his three companions, and asked them to unite with him in asking light from the God of heaven concerning this secret. He could have prayed alone and doubtless would have been heard, but in the union of God’s people there is prevailing power. The promise tells us that when two or three shall agree as touching any thing that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of the Father which is in heaven. (Matthew 18:19, 20.)
Daniel’s Hymn of Praise: “Daniel answered and said, Blessed be the name of God for ever and ever: for wisdom and might are his: And he changeth the times and the seasons: he removeth kings, and setteth up kings: he giveth wisdom unto the wise, and knowledge to them that know understanding: He revealeth the deep and secret things: he knoweth what is in the darkness,
(23) and the light dwelleth with him. I thank thee, and praise thee, O thou God of my fathers, who hast given me wisdom and might, and hast made known unto me now what we desired of thee: for thou hast now made known unto us the king’s matter.” Daniel 2:20-23 Daniel offered up praise to God for His gracious dealing with them. God is honored by our praise to Him for the things He has done for us, as well as by our petitions to Him for help. Let Daniel be our example in this. Let us not forget to return thanksgiving and praise for blessings given us. In the days of Christ’s ministry on earth, did He not cleanse ten lepers, and only one returned to give Him thanks? “But where,” asks Christ sorrowfully, “are the nine?” Luke 17:17. Daniel had the utmost confidence in what had been shown him. He did not first go to the king to see if what had been revealed to him was indeed the king’s dream, but he immediately praised God for having answered his prayer. Although the matter was revealed to Daniel, he did not take the honor to himself, as though it were by his prayers alone that the answer had come. He included his friends in his thanksgiving. It was, said he, “what we desired of Thee,” and Thou hast made it “known unto us.” “Therefore Daniel went in unto Arioch, whom the king had ordained to destroy the wise men of Babylon: he went and said thus unto him; Destroy not the wise men of Babylon: bring me in before the king, and I will shew unto the king the interpretation. Then Arioch brought in Daniel before the king in haste, and said thus unto him, I have found a man of the captives of Judah, that will make known unto the king the interpretation.” Daniel 2:24, 25 Daniel’s first plea was for the wise men of Babylon. De stroy them not, for the king’s secret is revealed, he implored. True, it was through no merit of theirs or their heathen sys tems of divination that this revelation was made. They were worthy of as much condemnation as before. But their own confession of utter impotence in the matter was humiliation enough for them, and Daniel was anxious that A Mysterious Dream
(24) Daniel and the Revelation they should so far partake of the benefits shown him as to have their lives spared. They were saved because there was a man of God among them. “The king answered and said to Daniel, whose name was Belteshazzar, Art thou able to make known unto me the dream which I have seen, and the interpretation thereof? Daniel answered in the presence of the king, and said, The secret which the king hath demanded cannot the wise men, the astrologers, the magicians, the soothsayers, shew unto the king; But there is a God in heaven that revealeth secrets, and maketh known to the king Nebuchadnezzar what shall be in the latter days. Thy dream, and the visions of thy head upon thy bed, are these;” Daniel 2:26-28 “Art thou able to make known unto me the dream?” was the king’s greeting to Daniel as he came into the royal presence. In spite of his previous acquaintance with this Hebrew, the king seemed to question his ability, so young and inexperienced, to make known a matter in which the aged and venerable magicians and soothsayers had utterly failed. Daniel declared plainly that the wise men, the astrologers, the soothsayers, and the magicians could not make known this secret. It was beyond their power. Therefore the king should not be angry with them, nor put confidence in their vain superstitions. The prophet proceeded to make known the true God, who rules in heaven, and is the only revealer of secrets. He it is, said Daniel, who “maketh known to the king Nebuchadnezzar what shall be in the latter days.” “As for thee, O king, thy thoughts came into thy mind upon thy bed, what should come to pass hereafter: and he that revealeth secrets maketh known to thee what shall come to pass. But as for me, this secret is not revealed to me for any wisdom that I have more than any living, but for their sakes that shall make known the interpretation to the king, and that thou mightest know the thoughts of thy heart.” Daniel 2:29, 30 Unlike some rulers, who fill up the present with folly and debauchery without regard to the future, the king
(25A) Mysterious Dream thought upon the days to come, with desire to know what would be in the years to follow. It was partly for this reason that God gave him this dream. Yet God would not work for the king independently of His own people. Though He gave the dream to the king, He sent the interpretation through one of His acknowledged servants. Daniel first disclaimed all credit for the interpretation, and then he sought to modify the king’s natural feelings of pride in being thus noticed by the God of heaven. He informed him that although the dream had been given to him, it was not for his sake alone that the interpretation was sent, but also for their sakes through whom it should be given. God had some servants there, and it was for them that He was working. They were of more value in His sight than the mightiest kings and potentates of earth. By this one act of revealing the king’s dream to Daniel, God made known to the king the things he desired; He saved His servants who trusted in Him; He brought before the Chaldean nation the knowledge of Him who knows the end from the beginning; He poured contempt on the false systems of the soothsayers and magicians; He honored His own name and exalted His servants in their eyes. He also laid into history an important prophetic waymark for us who live in the time of the end of this world. “Thou, O king, sawest, and behold a great image. This great image, whose brightness was excellent, stood before thee; and the form thereof was terrible. This image’s head was of fine gold, his breast and his arms of silver, his belly and his thighs of brass, His legs of iron, his feet part of iron and part of clay.” Daniel 2:31-33 Nebuchadnezzar, a worshiper of the gods of the Chaldean religion, was an idolater. An image was an object which would at once command his attention and respect. Moreover, earthly kingdoms, which, as we shall hereafter see, were represented by this image, were objects of esteem and value in his eyes. But how well suited was this image to convey a great
(26)[Daniel and the Revelation] and needful truth to the mind of Nebuchad nezzar. Besides delineating the progress of events through the whole course of time for the benefit of His people, God would show Nebuchadnezzar the utter emptiness and worthlessness of earthly pomp and glory. How could this be more impressively done than by an image whose head was of gold? Below this head was a body composed of inferior metals descending in value until they reached their basest form in the feet and toes of iron mingled with miry clay. “Thou sawest till that a stone was cut out without hands, which smote the image upon his feet that were of iron and clay, and brake them to pieces. Then was the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold, broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshingfloors; and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them: and the stone that smote the image became a great mountain, and filled the whole earth.” Daniel 2:34, 35 The whole was then dashed to pieces, and made like empty chaff. It was finally blown away where no place could be found for it. Then something durable and of heavenly worth occupied its place. So God would show to the children of men that earthly kingdoms are to pass away, and earthly greatness and glory, like a gaudy bubble, will break and vanish. In the place so long usurped by these, the kingdom of God shall be set up and have no end, while all who have an interest in that kingdom shall rest under the shadow of its peaceful wings forever and ever. “This is the dream; and we will tell the interpretation thereof before the king. Thou, O king, art a king of kings: for the God of heaven hath given thee a kingdom, power, and strength, and glory. And wheresoever the children of men dwell, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the heaven hath he given into thine hand, and hath made thee ruler over them all. Thou art this head of gold.” Daniel 2:36-38 Now opens one of the most comprehensive histories of world empires. Eight short verses of the inspired record tell the whole story, yet that story embraces the history of this world’s pomp and power. A few moments will suffice to
(27) commit it to memory; yet the period which it covers, beginning more than twenty-five cen turies ago, reaches from that far-distant point, past the rise and fall of kingdoms, past the setting up and overthrow of empires, past cycles and ages, and past our own day to eternity. It is complete, yet it is so minute that it gives us the great outlines of earthly kingdoms from that time to this. Human wisdom never devised so brief a record that embraced so much. Human language never set forth in so few words such a great volume of historical truth. The finger of God is here. Let us heed the lesson well. With what interest and astonishment must the king have listened as he was informed by the prophet that his kingdom was the golden head of the magnificent image? Daniel informed the king that the God of heaven had given him his kingdom, and made him ruler over all. This would restrain him from the pride of thinking that he had attained his posi tion by his own power and wisdom, and would enlist the gratitude of his heart toward the true God. “And after thee shall arise another kingdom inferior to thee, and another third kingdom of brass, which shall bear rule over all the earth.” Daniel 2:39 Nebuchadnezzar reigned forty-three years, and was suc ceeded by the following rulers: His son, Evil-Merodach, two years; Neriglissar, his son-in-law, four years; Laborosoarchod, Neriglissar’s son, nine months, which, being less than one year, is not counted in the canon of Ptolemy; and lastly, Nabonidus, whose son, Belshazzar, grandson of Nebuchadnezzar, was as sociated with him on the throne. “The proof of this association is contained in the cylinders of Nabonadius [Nabonidus] found at Mugheir, where the pro tection of the gods is asked for Nabu-nadid and his son Bel-shar-uzur, who are coupled together in a way that implies the co-sovereignty of the latter. (British Museum Series, Vol. I. pl. 68, no. 1.) [Understanding Daniel and the Revelation - pgs. 17-27].
Saturday, March 5, 2016
PREPARING FOR HEAVEN - Part 01
Thursday, October 29, 2015
ARE YOU PREPARING FOR THE CHALLANGE AHEAD?
Monday, December 22, 2014
Hospitals or Sanitariums
“Years ago message after [the] message was given, pointing out that the Sanitarium in Battle Creek was too large,” Ellen White wrote, “that plants should be made in different places, that memorials should
be established in many places, so that the light of present truth might shine forth.” (Testimonies to the Church Regarding our Youth Going to Battle Creek To Obtain An Education, page 26, emphasis
supplied).
"I have been instructed that in building so large a sanitarium in Battle Creek, men have followed their own devising. They have not been led by the Lord, but have done directly contrary to the light that He has given. I write these words in order that the example that has been set in Battle Creek shall not be followed in other places; for it is not in accordance with God’s plan. Instead of so large an institution being built in one place, plants should have been made in many cities in which there is nothing to represent the truth."
Ellen G. White, Testimonies for the Church Containing Letters to Instruction to Seventh-day Adventists,
page 23. (emphasis supplied). [it is mine]
Notice the important points. (1) “I have been instructed.” (2) “Men have followed their own devising.” (3) “They have not been led by the Lord, but have done directly contrary to the light that He has given.” (4) “The example that has been set in Battle Creek shall not be followed in other places; for it is
not in accordance with God’s plan.” (5) “Instead of so large an institution being built in one place, plants should have been made in many cities.” (6) And the most important point of all is that Adventists were to build “sanitariums,” not hospitals, and these sanitariums were to be built in many places – not “to better serve the community,” as has been often stated, but “to represent the truth.”
“It is not the Lord’s will for His people to erect a mammoth sanitarium in Battle Creek or in any other place,” Ellen White stated. “In many places in America, sanitariums are to be established.
These sanitariums are not to be large institutions, but are to be of sufficient size to enable the work to be carried forward successfully.” (Battle Creek Letters, page 48, emphasis supplied).
Just how large was the Battle Creek Sanitarium? How did the size of that institution compare to modern Seventh-day Adventist hospitals? Let us note the evidence and compare the results.
Battle Creek Sanitarium

“Late in the spring of 1877 construction began on a four-story brick veneer building 136 feet in length. . . ,” the SDA Encyclopedia states. “By the end of the century the sanitarium employed more than 900 workers, not only to provide health care, but also to operate the farms that supplied produce, milk, and eggs for the patients.” (Seventh-day Adventist Encyclopedia, Second Revised Edition, Art. “Battle Creek Sanitarium,” emphasis supplied).
White Memorial Medical Center
“With approximately 1,600 employees, 200 volunteers, and 450 physicians representing all major
medical specialties, White Memorial Medical Center provides a full range of inpatient,
outpatient, and home-care services,” the SDA Encyclopedia states. “It has grown into a fullservice hospital encompassing nine city blocks.” (ibid., Seventh-day Adventist Encyclopedia, Second Revised Edition, Art. “White Memorial Medical Center”).
Notice that when Adventist “sanitariums” moved into the large cities and became “hospitals,” there was no longer a need to employ personnel “to operate the farms that supplied produce,milk, and eggs for the patients.” Why? Because with hospitals located in large cities there was no longer “farms that supplied produce, milk, and eggs for the patients.” Now the Adventist Health Systems must provide food from commercial markets of the world, filled with toxic chemicals and preservatives. Was this God’s plan for last-day health reform?
Note carefully the following contrast between the number of employees and size of the two institutions, keeping in mind that the counsel from our Lord was “pointing out that the Sanitarium
in Battle Creek was too large.”
Size Battle Creek White Memorial
Four-story building Nine city blocks
Chapter 17 Stoning the Prophet
-327-
136 feet in length.
Personnel Battle Creek White Memorial
900 employees 1,600 employees
including farm 200 volunteers
workers 450 physicians
Total 900 2,250
Disregarding the Testimonies
“I have been instructed that in building so large a sanitarium in Battle Creek, men have followed
their own devising,” Ellen White wrote. “They have not been led by the Lord, but have done directly contrary to the light that He has given.” (Testimonies for the Church Containing Letters to Instruction to Seventh-day Adventists, page 23, emphasis supplied).
Battle Creek Sanitarium Before and After the Fire
The 900 Battle Creek employees included personnel to operate the farms. In addition to the 1,600 employees at White Memorial are “200 volunteers, and 450 physicians,” a grand total of 2,250 workers. These additional workers and physicians represent “all major medical specialties.”
White Memorial employs 1,350 more personnel than did Battle Creek Sanitarium at the turn of the century! Even the much larger five story, 550 by 500 feet, Battle Creek Sanitarium, constructed by Dr. Kellogg after the fire, was tiny in comparison to the nine city blocks of the White Memorial Hospital.
“But when the building was actually put under construction,” the SDA Encyclopedia states, “it became apparent that Dr. Kellogg had proceeded independently and had ordered an elaborately equipped building five stories in height and 550 feet in length, with extensions aggregating another 500 feet on the sides. . ..” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia, Art. “Battle Creek Sanitarium”).
This new Battle Creek Sanitarium, “five stories in height and 550 feet in length, with extensions aggregating another 500 feet on the sides,” proposed by John Harvey Kellogg was not the Sanitarium Ellen White stated was “too large.” The testimony she gave was that the previous Battle Creek Sanitarium was too large. That was the reason why the angels burned the former institution to the ground. Yet, this new, larger sanitarium proposed by Kellogg was tiny in comparison to contemporary Seventh-day Adventist medical institutions.
Disregarding the Testimonies Then
“When the Lord swept the large Sanitarium out of the way at Battle Creek, He did not design that it should ever be built there again,” the SDA Encyclopedia quotes Ellen White. “But in their blindness men went ahead and rebuilt the institution where it now stands.” (ibid., Seventh-day Adventist Encyclopedia, Second Revised Edition, Art. “Battle Creek Sanitarium;” op. sit.,
Testimonies to the Church, Regarding our Youth Going to Battle Creek To Obtain An Education,
page 26).
Disregarding the Testimonies Now
This testimony plainly states that the Lord did not design that the Battle Creek Sanitarium “should ever be built there again. But in their blindness men went ahead and rebuilt the
Chapter 17 Stoning the Prophet
-328-
institution where it now stands.” Yet after quoting this clear testimony, SDA Church leadership “in their blindness,” now owns and operates “the institution where it now stands.” Note carefully the following documented evidence:
“On Oct. 1, 1974—for the first time in its 108 years of service—the Battle Creek Sanitarium Hospital’s constituency voted to come under the ownership of the SDA Church,” the SDA Encyclopedia states. “Thus, this institution, which was the forerunner of the medical work of Seventh-day Adventists, became the church’s 394th medical facility.” (ibid., Seventh-day Adventist Encyclopedia, Second Revised Edition, Art. “Battle Creek Sanitarium,” emphasis supplied).
This statement is not completely correct. “This institution” was not “the forerunner of the medical work of Seventh-day Adventists.” This was the institution rebuilt by John Harvey Kellogg. The institution that was “the forerunner of the medical work of Seventh-day Adventists,” was burned to the ground Tuesday morning, February 18, 1902.
Loma Linda University Hospital
How does the Loma Linda University Hospital compare in size to the Battle Creek Sanitarium’s four story building, 136 feet in length, and 900 “workers?” Let us examine the facts as stated by the Seventh-day Adventist Encyclopedia.
“The construction of a new 500-bed medical center, including a research wing, made this
consolidation possible. . . ,” the SDA Encyclopedia states. “In addition, affiliations with other medical institutions in the vicinity of Loma Linda have been utilized.” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia, Art. “Loma Linda University Hospital”).
“In late 1962. . .they launched plans to erect a new, larger hospital-medical center complex. . . ,” the SDA Encyclopedia states. “Actual construction of the nine-story structure, with two levels underground, was begun soon after formal groundbreaking ceremonies on June 6, 1964. In July 1967 it was completed and occupied.” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia, Art. “Loma Linda University
Hospital”).
“Loma Linda University Medical Center is staffed by 4,500 employees. . . ,” the SDA Encyclopedia states. “In 1993 the medical center was licensed for more than 700 beds.” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia, Art. “Loma Linda University Hospital”).
%2BLoma%2BLinda%2B-%2B04.jpg)
“After negotiations the clinic located on the [Norton Air Force] base was donated to Loma Linda, along with a lot of clinic equipment,” the SDA Encyclopedia states. “The Social Action Community Health System (SACHS) is centered in the 42,300 square feet (4,000 square meters) of clinic space.” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia, Art. “Loma Linda University Hospital”).
Battle Creek and Loma Linda Compared
Size Battle Creek Loma Linda Medical Center
Four-story structure Nine-story structure,
136 feet in length two levels underground
700 beds
Personnel Battle Creek Loma Linda University Medical Center
900 employees 4,500 employees
including farm
-328-
Chapter 17 Stoning the Prophet
workers
Total 900 4,500
Disregarding the Testimonies
“It is not the Lord’s will for His people to erect a mammoth sanitarium in Battle Creek or in any other place. . . ,” Ellen White wrote. “These sanitariums are not to be large institutions. . ..” (ibid., Battle Creek Letters, page 48, emphasis supplied).
Other current Adventist hospitals, such as Glendale Adventist Medical Center, Porter Memorial(Denver, Colorado), Portland (Oregon) Adventist Hospital, Hinsdale Hospital (Chicago,Illinois), and Kettering Medical Center (Ohio), to name a few, are many times larger than the Battle Creek Sanatarium which Ellen White strongly condemned. The Seventh-day Adventist movement was not to be drawn into competition with Protestant and Roman Catholic large city hospital systems. The counsel was that Adventists were to establish many smaller Sanitariums in the country, utilizing hydrotherapy and other methods of natural healing. Patients would come to these small Sanitariums and stay several weeks, rather than in and out overnight. They would learn how to eat properly and care for their bodies, but more important, they would be taught the three angel’s messages.
Over one hundred and fifty years have passed since the Lord gave this people special messages on health and natural healing. The world is just now learning the values of alternative medicine.
We as a people have failed miserably in educating the world to these methods of healing. We have been duped into investing time and millions of dollars in the world’s method of healing.
Why? Because billions and billions can be realized in the modern hospital systems. What has been the result? Adventist medical facilities are on the verge of bankruptcy. Why else would the Adventist Health Systems merge with those of the Papacy? (See, Judith Graham, “Hospital Alliance Explored,” Denver Post, January 13, 1995).
Large Medical Centers Not God’s Will
“I write these words in order that the example that has been set in Battle Creek shall not be followed in other places,” Ellen White counseled, “for it is not in accordance with God’s plan.”
(ibid., Testimonies for the Church Containing Letters to Instruction to Seventh-day Adventists, page 23, emphasis supplied).
“It is not the Lord’s will for His people to erect a mammoth sanitarium in Battle Creek or in any other place.” (ibid., Battle Creek Letters, p. 48, emphasis supplied).
Sanitariums Established Out Of the Cities
Ellen White received much light from heaven that Seventh-day Adventist institutions should be established out of the cities. Indeed, the following testimony was titled, “No Large Business Firms in the Cities.”
“God has sent warning after warning that our schools and publishing houses and sanitariums are to be established out of the city, in places where the youth may be taught most effectively what is truth,” Ellen White wrote. “Let no one attempt to use the Testimonies to vindicate the establishment of large business interests in the cities. Do not make of no effect the light that has been given upon this subject.” (The Publishing Ministry, page 185, emphasis supplied.
-329-
Disregarding the Testimonies By Establishing In the Cities White Memorial Medical Center “is located at 1720 Cesar E. Chavez Avenue in Los Angeles,
California.”
The hospital encompasses “nine city blocks in East Los Angeles, one of the fastest growing inner-city communities in the United States.” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia, emphasis supplied).
Glendale Adventist Medical Center is “situated on a 32-acre tract in Glendale, California.” (ibid.,
SDA Encyclopedia, Art. “Glendale Adventist Medical Center”).
“Porter Memorial Hospital is, “An acute general 368-bed hospital located at 2525 South
Downing Street, Denver, Colorado.” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia, emphasis supplied).
“Portland Adventist Medical Center “is located in Portland, Oregon’s east side, at 10123 SE. Market Street, just off Interstate 205 and close to Interstate 84,” so states the SDA Encyclopedia.
“More than 1.5 million people live in the metropolitan area.” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia, emphasis supplied).
E. G. White Could Not Approve Plans For Building In Los Angeles
The following testimony was titled, “Could not Approve Plans for Building in Los Angeles.” An Ellen G. White Estate “Note” at the beginning of this statement declared that the “Statement[was] made by E. G. White, September 15, 1902, at a council meeting called in Los Angeles to consider plans for the erection of a building on Hill Street to be used for restaurant and sanitarium work.” (Manuscript Releases, Vol. 1, page 248, emphasis supplied).
The Seventh-day Adventist Encyclopedia stated that the White Memorial Medical Center is “an institution that began as a clinic that opened in a rented store building at 941 East First Street on Sept. 29, 1913.” This was eleven years after Ellen White’s objection to a health food “restaurant and sanitarium work” established in the city of Los Angeles.
Why would Ellen White object to such a fine project? Because she knew from the counsel she had received that in time this project in the heart of Los Angeles would grow “into a full-service hospital encompassing nine city blocks in East Los Angeles, one of the fastest-growing inner-city communities in the United States.” (ibid.,
SDA Encyclopedia, emphasis supplied).
Do Not Establish A Sanitarium In Cities
“With the light that I have had in regard to sanitariums where the sick are to be treated I cannot give one word of counsel about huddling in the city [Los Angeles]. . . ,” Ellen White stated. “I could not do it, because it has been so distinctly laid before me that when a sanitarium is built, it must be located where it can accomplish the end in view--the object for which it is established.”
(ibid., Manuscript Releases, Vol. 1, page 248, emphasis supplied).
Disregarding the Testimonies By Building In the City Of Los Angeles
“White Memorial Medical Center. . .is located at 1720 Cesar E. Chavez Avenue in Los Angeles, California. . .encompassing nine city blocks in East Los Angeles.” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia).
Justifying Policy By Naming the Institution After Ellen White
Ellen White was against establishing a sanitarium (what would she say about a hospital?) in Los Angeles. SDA Church leadership disregarded her testimony and established one there. Three years after her death they named the institution after her.
Chapter 17 Stoning the Prophet
-331-
“On the afternoon of Apr. 21, 1918, the clinic’s name was changed to White Memorial Hospital, and was formally dedicated in memory of Ellen G. White.” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia, emphasis supplied).
Repercussion Of Disregarding the Testimonies
In 1984 a surgical team at Loma Linda University Medical Center transplanted a baboon heart into an infant child. The operation was followed closely by the media around the world, and became quickly known as “the Baby Fae Case.” The infant did not live. The funeral was held at the Loma Linda University Church. A Roman Catholic Priest presided at the service.
Immediately following the service, people released helium-filled balloons into the air in the front of the church. The news media cameras followed the rise of the balloons as if they were the infant’s soul or spirit rising toward heaven.
On November 10, 1984, the Los Angeles Times reported in the religion section, “Adventists See No Conflict Of Belief In Baby Fae Case.” The following are a few heretical excerpts from that
article:
“Transplanting a baboon’s heart into the body of an infant human in a medical center run by the Seventh-day Adventist Church may seem an oddity for a denomination that teaches creationism and recommends vegetarianism.” John Dart, Times Religion Writer reported. (Los Angeles Times, Saturday, November 10, 1984, Part II, emphasis supplied).
“But a range of church members say that there is no religious conflict or discomfort in their minds about the Oct. 26 operation on Baby Fae by Adventist surgeon Dr. Leonard Bailey at Loma Linda University Medical Center,” Dart added further. “Rather, they say, the cherishing of life is an overriding view in their health-conscious church.” (ibid., LA Times, 11/10/84, emphasis supplied).
“Cherishing of Life” in their “health-conscious church?” One only has to review the documents of “Project Whitecoat,” the joint United States Army/Seventh-day Adventist Church germ warfare experiments, to see that this statement is a total contradiction. (See, Martin D. Turner,
“Project Whitecoat,” Spectrum, Summer, 1970).[Also see article on my blog: "The White Coat Project"].
“Contrary to evolutionary theory, a literal reading of the Creation in the Bible makes animals and humans unrelated,” Dart stated. “But the creationist tradition seemed to present no religious basis for objection, and in fact, Adventist scholars who were interviewed said that evolutionary theory today is winning more adherents among church members– particularly scientists and intellectuals.”
(ibid., LA Times, 11/10/84, emphasis supplied).
“Human inventions, called education, have been counter-working the infinite counsels of
Heaven,” Ellen White would say to contemporary Adventist scholars, scientists and intellectuals. “This is called higher education; but it is an insult to God.” (Manuscript Releases, Vol. 3, page 321, emphasis supplied).
John Dart quoted one Loma Linda professor as stating that “The amalgam of man and beast has proved to be no problem and perhaps testifies to long-standing, increasingly sophisticated approach to health and medicine in Adventism since its founding in the mid-19th century.”(ibid., LA Times, 11/10/84, emphasis supplied).
Evidently, a “long-standing, increasingly sophisticated approach to health and medicine in
-331-
Chapter 17 Stoning the Prophet
[contemporary] Adventism” allows for young boys in the Church to become guinea pigs in the germ warfare experiments of Project Whitecoat. (See above). Such thinking on the part of SDA Church leadership is a travesty indeed. And to think that they would boldly express such heresy openly to one of the largest newspapers in America is astonishing to say the least.
“The guardians of the Adventist Church. . . are content with a morality of form without
substance,” Rose magazine stated, “one in which the arts of disease can be presented as the healing arts, and in which germ warfare can be embraced in pious obedience to divine injunction against death.” (Rose, pages 179, 180; op sit., Martin D. Turner, “Project Whitecoat,” Spectrum,
Summer, 1970, emphasis supplied).
“A creationism-vs-evolution debate has come into the open recently in the church,” the Loma Linda professor stated further to Times reporter John Dart, “an indication in one sense of how medical training could proceed on a pragmatic level while religious ideology remained in the hands of pastors and church theologians.” (ibid., LA Times, 11/10/84, emphasis supplied).
“I would say a majority of Adventist scientists would have difficulty accepting at face value the church’s traditional seven-day Creation occurring 6,000 years ago,” James Walters, Assistant Professor of Christian Ethics at Loma Linda University, told Times reporter John Dart. (ibid., LA Times, 11/10/84, emphasis supplied).
To comment on this statement would be redundant. A person who does not believe in the
seven-day creation week recorded in Scripture is not a Seventh-day Adventist. What in the world do they think the words Seventh-day Adventist mean? The name was chosen by pioneer Adventists to honor the seventh day Sabbath and the Lord of all creation – that the Lord created the earth in six days and rested on the seventh. (Genesis 2:1-3). At this point it is obvious that the Professors of contemporary Adventist colleges and universities no longer believe in the Spirit of Prophecy. Could it be that they also no longer believe in Scripture?
“Man’s learning may be considered supreme, but it is not that higher education which he can take with him into the kingdom of heaven,” Ellen White comments. “The learned men of the world, notwithstanding all their intellectual studies, know not the truth as it is in Jesus.” (Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, July 18, 1899, emphasis supplied).
“In his epistle to the Ephesians,” Ellen White added further, “Paul brings to view a kind of education which these supposed intellectual stars have not.” (ibid., R&H, 7/18/99 [Ephesians 1:3-6 quoted.].
“For the first time in [Adventist] history, a whole generation of scholars with doctorates from secular universities became active in church institutions,” Edward Lugenbeal wrote. “Probing, open to change, skeptical of tradition, imbued with the valued and culture of higher education, this new breed of `progressive’ Adventist intellectual soon began to reevaluate Adventist traditions.” (op sit., John Dart, LA Times, 11/10/84, emphasis supplied).
“There will be an effort made on the part of many pretended friends of education to divorce religion from the sciences, in our schools,” Ellen White stated. “They would spare no pains or expense to impart secular knowledge; but they would not mingle with it a knowledge of what God has revealed as constituting perfection of character. . . .” (Christian Education, page 113, emphasis supplied).
-332-
What more needs to be said dear reader. Are SDA institutions following the Divine plan?
“Years ago message after [the] message was given, pointing out that the Sanitarium in Battle Creek was too large,” Ellen White wrote, “that plants should be made in different places, that memorials should
be established in many places, so that the light of present truth might shine forth.” (Testimonies to the Church Regarding our Youth Going to Battle Creek To Obtain An Education, page 26, emphasis
supplied).
"I have been instructed that in building so large a sanitarium in Battle Creek, men have followed their own devising. They have not been led by the Lord, but have done directly contrary to the light that He has given. I write these words in order that the example that has been set in Battle Creek shall not be followed in other places; for it is not in accordance with God’s plan. Instead of so large an institution being built in one place, plants should have been made in many cities in which there is nothing to represent the truth."
Ellen G. White, Testimonies for the Church Containing Letters to Instruction to Seventh-day Adventists,
page 23. (emphasis supplied). [it is mine]
Notice the important points. (1) “I have been instructed.” (2) “Men have followed their own devising.” (3) “They have not been led by the Lord, but have done directly contrary to the light that He has given.” (4) “The example that has been set in Battle Creek shall not be followed in other places; for it is
not in accordance with God’s plan.” (5) “Instead of so large an institution being built in one place, plants should have been made in many cities.” (6) And the most important point of all is that Adventists were to build “sanitariums,” not hospitals, and these sanitariums were to be built in many places – not “to better serve the community,” as has been often stated, but “to represent the truth.”
“It is not the Lord’s will for His people to erect a mammoth sanitarium in Battle Creek or in any other place,” Ellen White stated. “In many places in America, sanitariums are to be established.
These sanitariums are not to be large institutions, but are to be of sufficient size to enable the work to be carried forward successfully.” (Battle Creek Letters, page 48, emphasis supplied).
Just how large was the Battle Creek Sanitarium? How did the size of that institution compare to modern Seventh-day Adventist hospitals? Let us note the evidence and compare the results.
Battle Creek Sanitarium

“Late in the spring of 1877 construction began on a four-story brick veneer building 136 feet in length. . . ,” the SDA Encyclopedia states. “By the end of the century the sanitarium employed more than 900 workers, not only to provide health care, but also to operate the farms that supplied produce, milk, and eggs for the patients.” (Seventh-day Adventist Encyclopedia, Second Revised Edition, Art. “Battle Creek Sanitarium,” emphasis supplied).
White Memorial Medical Center
“With approximately 1,600 employees, 200 volunteers, and 450 physicians representing all major
medical specialties, White Memorial Medical Center provides a full range of inpatient,
outpatient, and home-care services,” the SDA Encyclopedia states. “It has grown into a fullservice hospital encompassing nine city blocks.” (ibid., Seventh-day Adventist Encyclopedia, Second Revised Edition, Art. “White Memorial Medical Center”).
Notice that when Adventist “sanitariums” moved into the large cities and became “hospitals,” there was no longer a need to employ personnel “to operate the farms that supplied produce,milk, and eggs for the patients.” Why? Because with hospitals located in large cities there was no longer “farms that supplied produce, milk, and eggs for the patients.” Now the Adventist Health Systems must provide food from commercial markets of the world, filled with toxic chemicals and preservatives. Was this God’s plan for last-day health reform?
Note carefully the following contrast between the number of employees and size of the two institutions, keeping in mind that the counsel from our Lord was “pointing out that the Sanitarium
in Battle Creek was too large.”
Size Battle Creek White Memorial
Four-story building Nine city blocks
Chapter 17 Stoning the Prophet
-327-
136 feet in length.
Personnel Battle Creek White Memorial
900 employees 1,600 employees
including farm 200 volunteers
workers 450 physicians
Total 900 2,250
Disregarding the Testimonies
“I have been instructed that in building so large a sanitarium in Battle Creek, men have followed
their own devising,” Ellen White wrote. “They have not been led by the Lord, but have done directly contrary to the light that He has given.” (Testimonies for the Church Containing Letters to Instruction to Seventh-day Adventists, page 23, emphasis supplied).
Battle Creek Sanitarium Before and After the Fire
The 900 Battle Creek employees included personnel to operate the farms. In addition to the 1,600 employees at White Memorial are “200 volunteers, and 450 physicians,” a grand total of 2,250 workers. These additional workers and physicians represent “all major medical specialties.”
White Memorial employs 1,350 more personnel than did Battle Creek Sanitarium at the turn of the century! Even the much larger five story, 550 by 500 feet, Battle Creek Sanitarium, constructed by Dr. Kellogg after the fire, was tiny in comparison to the nine city blocks of the White Memorial Hospital.
“But when the building was actually put under construction,” the SDA Encyclopedia states, “it became apparent that Dr. Kellogg had proceeded independently and had ordered an elaborately equipped building five stories in height and 550 feet in length, with extensions aggregating another 500 feet on the sides. . ..” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia, Art. “Battle Creek Sanitarium”).
This new Battle Creek Sanitarium, “five stories in height and 550 feet in length, with extensions aggregating another 500 feet on the sides,” proposed by John Harvey Kellogg was not the Sanitarium Ellen White stated was “too large.” The testimony she gave was that the previous Battle Creek Sanitarium was too large. That was the reason why the angels burned the former institution to the ground. Yet, this new, larger sanitarium proposed by Kellogg was tiny in comparison to contemporary Seventh-day Adventist medical institutions.
Disregarding the Testimonies Then
“When the Lord swept the large Sanitarium out of the way at Battle Creek, He did not design that it should ever be built there again,” the SDA Encyclopedia quotes Ellen White. “But in their blindness men went ahead and rebuilt the institution where it now stands.” (ibid., Seventh-day Adventist Encyclopedia, Second Revised Edition, Art. “Battle Creek Sanitarium;” op. sit.,
Testimonies to the Church, Regarding our Youth Going to Battle Creek To Obtain An Education,
page 26).
Disregarding the Testimonies Now
This testimony plainly states that the Lord did not design that the Battle Creek Sanitarium “should ever be built there again. But in their blindness men went ahead and rebuilt the
Chapter 17 Stoning the Prophet
-328-
institution where it now stands.” Yet after quoting this clear testimony, SDA Church leadership “in their blindness,” now owns and operates “the institution where it now stands.” Note carefully the following documented evidence:
“On Oct. 1, 1974—for the first time in its 108 years of service—the Battle Creek Sanitarium Hospital’s constituency voted to come under the ownership of the SDA Church,” the SDA Encyclopedia states. “Thus, this institution, which was the forerunner of the medical work of Seventh-day Adventists, became the church’s 394th medical facility.” (ibid., Seventh-day Adventist Encyclopedia, Second Revised Edition, Art. “Battle Creek Sanitarium,” emphasis supplied).
This statement is not completely correct. “This institution” was not “the forerunner of the medical work of Seventh-day Adventists.” This was the institution rebuilt by John Harvey Kellogg. The institution that was “the forerunner of the medical work of Seventh-day Adventists,” was burned to the ground Tuesday morning, February 18, 1902.
Loma Linda University Hospital
How does the Loma Linda University Hospital compare in size to the Battle Creek Sanitarium’s four story building, 136 feet in length, and 900 “workers?” Let us examine the facts as stated by the Seventh-day Adventist Encyclopedia.
“The construction of a new 500-bed medical center, including a research wing, made this
consolidation possible. . . ,” the SDA Encyclopedia states. “In addition, affiliations with other medical institutions in the vicinity of Loma Linda have been utilized.” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia, Art. “Loma Linda University Hospital”).
“In late 1962. . .they launched plans to erect a new, larger hospital-medical center complex. . . ,” the SDA Encyclopedia states. “Actual construction of the nine-story structure, with two levels underground, was begun soon after formal groundbreaking ceremonies on June 6, 1964. In July 1967 it was completed and occupied.” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia, Art. “Loma Linda University
Hospital”).
“Loma Linda University Medical Center is staffed by 4,500 employees. . . ,” the SDA Encyclopedia states. “In 1993 the medical center was licensed for more than 700 beds.” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia, Art. “Loma Linda University Hospital”).
%2BLoma%2BLinda%2B-%2B04.jpg)
“After negotiations the clinic located on the [Norton Air Force] base was donated to Loma Linda, along with a lot of clinic equipment,” the SDA Encyclopedia states. “The Social Action Community Health System (SACHS) is centered in the 42,300 square feet (4,000 square meters) of clinic space.” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia, Art. “Loma Linda University Hospital”).
Battle Creek and Loma Linda Compared
Size Battle Creek Loma Linda Medical Center
Four-story structure Nine-story structure,
136 feet in length two levels underground
700 beds
Personnel Battle Creek Loma Linda University Medical Center
900 employees 4,500 employees
including farm
-328-
Chapter 17 Stoning the Prophet
workers
Total 900 4,500
Disregarding the Testimonies
“It is not the Lord’s will for His people to erect a mammoth sanitarium in Battle Creek or in any other place. . . ,” Ellen White wrote. “These sanitariums are not to be large institutions. . ..” (ibid., Battle Creek Letters, page 48, emphasis supplied).
Other current Adventist hospitals, such as Glendale Adventist Medical Center, Porter Memorial(Denver, Colorado), Portland (Oregon) Adventist Hospital, Hinsdale Hospital (Chicago,Illinois), and Kettering Medical Center (Ohio), to name a few, are many times larger than the Battle Creek Sanatarium which Ellen White strongly condemned. The Seventh-day Adventist movement was not to be drawn into competition with Protestant and Roman Catholic large city hospital systems. The counsel was that Adventists were to establish many smaller Sanitariums in the country, utilizing hydrotherapy and other methods of natural healing. Patients would come to these small Sanitariums and stay several weeks, rather than in and out overnight. They would learn how to eat properly and care for their bodies, but more important, they would be taught the three angel’s messages.
Over one hundred and fifty years have passed since the Lord gave this people special messages on health and natural healing. The world is just now learning the values of alternative medicine.
We as a people have failed miserably in educating the world to these methods of healing. We have been duped into investing time and millions of dollars in the world’s method of healing.
Why? Because billions and billions can be realized in the modern hospital systems. What has been the result? Adventist medical facilities are on the verge of bankruptcy. Why else would the Adventist Health Systems merge with those of the Papacy? (See, Judith Graham, “Hospital Alliance Explored,” Denver Post, January 13, 1995).
Large Medical Centers Not God’s Will
“I write these words in order that the example that has been set in Battle Creek shall not be followed in other places,” Ellen White counseled, “for it is not in accordance with God’s plan.”
(ibid., Testimonies for the Church Containing Letters to Instruction to Seventh-day Adventists, page 23, emphasis supplied).
“It is not the Lord’s will for His people to erect a mammoth sanitarium in Battle Creek or in any other place.” (ibid., Battle Creek Letters, p. 48, emphasis supplied).
Sanitariums Established Out Of the Cities
Ellen White received much light from heaven that Seventh-day Adventist institutions should be established out of the cities. Indeed, the following testimony was titled, “No Large Business Firms in the Cities.”
“God has sent warning after warning that our schools and publishing houses and sanitariums are to be established out of the city, in places where the youth may be taught most effectively what is truth,” Ellen White wrote. “Let no one attempt to use the Testimonies to vindicate the establishment of large business interests in the cities. Do not make of no effect the light that has been given upon this subject.” (The Publishing Ministry, page 185, emphasis supplied.
-329-
Disregarding the Testimonies By Establishing In the Cities White Memorial Medical Center “is located at 1720 Cesar E. Chavez Avenue in Los Angeles,
California.”
The hospital encompasses “nine city blocks in East Los Angeles, one of the fastest growing inner-city communities in the United States.” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia, emphasis supplied).
Glendale Adventist Medical Center is “situated on a 32-acre tract in Glendale, California.” (ibid.,
SDA Encyclopedia, Art. “Glendale Adventist Medical Center”).
“Porter Memorial Hospital is, “An acute general 368-bed hospital located at 2525 South
Downing Street, Denver, Colorado.” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia, emphasis supplied).
“Portland Adventist Medical Center “is located in Portland, Oregon’s east side, at 10123 SE. Market Street, just off Interstate 205 and close to Interstate 84,” so states the SDA Encyclopedia.
“More than 1.5 million people live in the metropolitan area.” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia, emphasis supplied).
E. G. White Could Not Approve Plans For Building In Los Angeles
The following testimony was titled, “Could not Approve Plans for Building in Los Angeles.” An Ellen G. White Estate “Note” at the beginning of this statement declared that the “Statement[was] made by E. G. White, September 15, 1902, at a council meeting called in Los Angeles to consider plans for the erection of a building on Hill Street to be used for restaurant and sanitarium work.” (Manuscript Releases, Vol. 1, page 248, emphasis supplied).
The Seventh-day Adventist Encyclopedia stated that the White Memorial Medical Center is “an institution that began as a clinic that opened in a rented store building at 941 East First Street on Sept. 29, 1913.” This was eleven years after Ellen White’s objection to a health food “restaurant and sanitarium work” established in the city of Los Angeles.
Why would Ellen White object to such a fine project? Because she knew from the counsel she had received that in time this project in the heart of Los Angeles would grow “into a full-service hospital encompassing nine city blocks in East Los Angeles, one of the fastest-growing inner-city communities in the United States.” (ibid.,
SDA Encyclopedia, emphasis supplied).
Do Not Establish A Sanitarium In Cities
“With the light that I have had in regard to sanitariums where the sick are to be treated I cannot give one word of counsel about huddling in the city [Los Angeles]. . . ,” Ellen White stated. “I could not do it, because it has been so distinctly laid before me that when a sanitarium is built, it must be located where it can accomplish the end in view--the object for which it is established.”
(ibid., Manuscript Releases, Vol. 1, page 248, emphasis supplied).
Disregarding the Testimonies By Building In the City Of Los Angeles
“White Memorial Medical Center. . .is located at 1720 Cesar E. Chavez Avenue in Los Angeles, California. . .encompassing nine city blocks in East Los Angeles.” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia).
Justifying Policy By Naming the Institution After Ellen White
Ellen White was against establishing a sanitarium (what would she say about a hospital?) in Los Angeles. SDA Church leadership disregarded her testimony and established one there. Three years after her death they named the institution after her.
Chapter 17 Stoning the Prophet
-331-
“On the afternoon of Apr. 21, 1918, the clinic’s name was changed to White Memorial Hospital, and was formally dedicated in memory of Ellen G. White.” (ibid., SDA Encyclopedia, emphasis supplied).
Repercussion Of Disregarding the Testimonies
In 1984 a surgical team at Loma Linda University Medical Center transplanted a baboon heart into an infant child. The operation was followed closely by the media around the world, and became quickly known as “the Baby Fae Case.” The infant did not live. The funeral was held at the Loma Linda University Church. A Roman Catholic Priest presided at the service.
Immediately following the service, people released helium-filled balloons into the air in the front of the church. The news media cameras followed the rise of the balloons as if they were the infant’s soul or spirit rising toward heaven.
On November 10, 1984, the Los Angeles Times reported in the religion section, “Adventists See No Conflict Of Belief In Baby Fae Case.” The following are a few heretical excerpts from that
article:
“Transplanting a baboon’s heart into the body of an infant human in a medical center run by the Seventh-day Adventist Church may seem an oddity for a denomination that teaches creationism and recommends vegetarianism.” John Dart, Times Religion Writer reported. (Los Angeles Times, Saturday, November 10, 1984, Part II, emphasis supplied).
“But a range of church members say that there is no religious conflict or discomfort in their minds about the Oct. 26 operation on Baby Fae by Adventist surgeon Dr. Leonard Bailey at Loma Linda University Medical Center,” Dart added further. “Rather, they say, the cherishing of life is an overriding view in their health-conscious church.” (ibid., LA Times, 11/10/84, emphasis supplied).
“Cherishing of Life” in their “health-conscious church?” One only has to review the documents of “Project Whitecoat,” the joint United States Army/Seventh-day Adventist Church germ warfare experiments, to see that this statement is a total contradiction. (See, Martin D. Turner,
“Project Whitecoat,” Spectrum, Summer, 1970).[Also see article on my blog: "The White Coat Project"].
“Contrary to evolutionary theory, a literal reading of the Creation in the Bible makes animals and humans unrelated,” Dart stated. “But the creationist tradition seemed to present no religious basis for objection, and in fact, Adventist scholars who were interviewed said that evolutionary theory today is winning more adherents among church members– particularly scientists and intellectuals.”
(ibid., LA Times, 11/10/84, emphasis supplied).
“Human inventions, called education, have been counter-working the infinite counsels of
Heaven,” Ellen White would say to contemporary Adventist scholars, scientists and intellectuals. “This is called higher education; but it is an insult to God.” (Manuscript Releases, Vol. 3, page 321, emphasis supplied).
John Dart quoted one Loma Linda professor as stating that “The amalgam of man and beast has proved to be no problem and perhaps testifies to long-standing, increasingly sophisticated approach to health and medicine in Adventism since its founding in the mid-19th century.”(ibid., LA Times, 11/10/84, emphasis supplied).
Evidently, a “long-standing, increasingly sophisticated approach to health and medicine in
-331-
Chapter 17 Stoning the Prophet
[contemporary] Adventism” allows for young boys in the Church to become guinea pigs in the germ warfare experiments of Project Whitecoat. (See above). Such thinking on the part of SDA Church leadership is a travesty indeed. And to think that they would boldly express such heresy openly to one of the largest newspapers in America is astonishing to say the least.
“The guardians of the Adventist Church. . . are content with a morality of form without
substance,” Rose magazine stated, “one in which the arts of disease can be presented as the healing arts, and in which germ warfare can be embraced in pious obedience to divine injunction against death.” (Rose, pages 179, 180; op sit., Martin D. Turner, “Project Whitecoat,” Spectrum,
Summer, 1970, emphasis supplied).
“A creationism-vs-evolution debate has come into the open recently in the church,” the Loma Linda professor stated further to Times reporter John Dart, “an indication in one sense of how medical training could proceed on a pragmatic level while religious ideology remained in the hands of pastors and church theologians.” (ibid., LA Times, 11/10/84, emphasis supplied).
“I would say a majority of Adventist scientists would have difficulty accepting at face value the church’s traditional seven-day Creation occurring 6,000 years ago,” James Walters, Assistant Professor of Christian Ethics at Loma Linda University, told Times reporter John Dart. (ibid., LA Times, 11/10/84, emphasis supplied).
To comment on this statement would be redundant. A person who does not believe in the
seven-day creation week recorded in Scripture is not a Seventh-day Adventist. What in the world do they think the words Seventh-day Adventist mean? The name was chosen by pioneer Adventists to honor the seventh day Sabbath and the Lord of all creation – that the Lord created the earth in six days and rested on the seventh. (Genesis 2:1-3). At this point it is obvious that the Professors of contemporary Adventist colleges and universities no longer believe in the Spirit of Prophecy. Could it be that they also no longer believe in Scripture?
“Man’s learning may be considered supreme, but it is not that higher education which he can take with him into the kingdom of heaven,” Ellen White comments. “The learned men of the world, notwithstanding all their intellectual studies, know not the truth as it is in Jesus.” (Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, July 18, 1899, emphasis supplied).
“In his epistle to the Ephesians,” Ellen White added further, “Paul brings to view a kind of education which these supposed intellectual stars have not.” (ibid., R&H, 7/18/99 [Ephesians 1:3-6 quoted.].
“For the first time in [Adventist] history, a whole generation of scholars with doctorates from secular universities became active in church institutions,” Edward Lugenbeal wrote. “Probing, open to change, skeptical of tradition, imbued with the valued and culture of higher education, this new breed of `progressive’ Adventist intellectual soon began to reevaluate Adventist traditions.” (op sit., John Dart, LA Times, 11/10/84, emphasis supplied).
“There will be an effort made on the part of many pretended friends of education to divorce religion from the sciences, in our schools,” Ellen White stated. “They would spare no pains or expense to impart secular knowledge; but they would not mingle with it a knowledge of what God has revealed as constituting perfection of character. . . .” (Christian Education, page 113, emphasis supplied).
-332-
What more needs to be said dear reader. Are SDA institutions following the Divine plan?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

